Engineering
What is the price of PetroChina cable under Liao Yongyong?
The "Liao Yongyong era" has come to an end, but his "willfulness" as the general manager of China National Petroleum Corporation (hereinafter referred to as PetroChina) has not yet begun. As we all know, Liao Yong has been in charge of oil and gas pipelines for a long time and holds the power of engineering construction. As a general electrical material wire and cable, under its price, is not very "capricious?
What is the price of PetroChina cable under Liao Yongyong?
Time: 2015-08-28 17:05:04Source:China Quality News NetworkAuthor: Zhou Xun
The "Liao Yongyong era" has come to an end, but his "willfulness" as the general manager of China National Petroleum Corporation (hereinafter referred to as PetroChina) has not yet begun. As we all know, Liao Yong has been in charge of oil and gas pipelines for a long time and holds the power of engineering construction. As a general electrical material wire and cable, under its price, is not very "capricious?
As a professional technical and price consulting service organization in the wire and cable industry, China Cable Online conducted price monitoring and analysis early warning on PetroChina's "Bidding Project for Instrument and Cable of Lun-Tuzhi Trunk Line Increase Transmission Project" in October 2014, and sent the "Price Analysis of Bid Opening Results and Prompts for Performance of Winning Bidders and Supervision of Subjectives" to the tenderee for verification.
According to the information held by China Cable Online, on August 18, 2014, China Oil Pipeline Material and Equipment Corporation, affiliated to PetroChina, was entrusted and organized by the Rotary PC Project Department for the procurement of instrument cables for the Rotary-Rotary Branch trunk line increase transmission project (bidding numbers: 2014XM-LT-YQZB-027, Package A and Package B). Only 4 bidders bid, and the following problems may exist: ① unreasonable design selection. Under normal circumstances, steel tape armored cable does not use soft structure conductor and copper wire braided shield, this design is suspected of choosing "non-standard" to deliberately circumvent material supervision. At that time, although the frame of this type of cable was invited for bidding in 2013, the price somehow did not hang up the net in time. ② The bid price is abnormally high. Nearly 3 times higher than the market price; more than 2 times higher than the price of the wire and cable network of PetroChina Class A suppliers (compared by similar models). ③ Suspected of bid rigging. On June 12, 2014, China Petroleum Materials Company, which is also a subsidiary of PetroChina, was entrusted by the EPC Project Department of the West Section of the West Third Line and organized the pipeline engineering cable project of the West Third Line of the Pipeline Bureau with 21 Class A suppliers participating in the bidding. The quotation level of these 4 bidders is only more than 30% of the quotation of the above projects, the bidding quotation level of user projects outside PetroChina is lower [the bidding quotation of some projects of the bidder (inside and outside PetroChina system) and the bidding comparison table (relative material quota range) have been submitted to the tenderee in the form of attachment together with the monitoring prompt report].
The devil is one foot high, the Tao is ten feet high. On March 17, 2015, PetroChina's "2015 centralized procurement of electrical materials fixed pricing bidding" once again incorporated this "unreasonable selection of cable products" into the supervision system for bidding, and released the online price in April. If the subject matter of the project is settled according to the net price in 2015, it is only 5.2767 million yuan, which is far lower than the winning bidder's 14.4813 million yuan; after deducting the influence factors of copper price, it is also nearly three times higher than the market price.
If the above problems are true, according to my country's "Bidding Law", "Price Law", and "Anti-Unfair Competition Law", there are violations of regulations and laws in this bidding, and the state-owned assets of CNPC will directly lose nearly 8 million yuan (the total amount of the two packages of the winning bid is only 14.4813 million yuan). See the following table for price analysis of specific project bid sections:

Funny thing is, PetroChina has made two public announcements (pre-winning bidder and winning bidder) on the bid evaluation results of the "Bidding Project for Instrument and Cable of Lun-Tuzhi Trunk Line Increase Transmission Project" according to law, but we cannot find out the details of this "Bidding Announcement. PetroChina has more than 22 Class A cable suppliers. Why only 4 of them participated in the bidding for the bid section of this project? We visited nearly 10 Class A cable suppliers, but everyone was not surprised. For the bidding and purchasing of wires and cables in PetroChina's oil and gas pipeline section, this kind of bidding and fixing magic drama has become commonplace and commonplace. This kind of open and fair bidding that seems to be "winning the bid at the lowest price" is only a stage drama manipulated by a few people, the corruption behind it is beyond the imagination of ordinary people. Sichuan Star Cable, which used to be the "master" of PetroChina, once accounted for 40% of the company's revenue based on orders from PetroChina. It is also said that a leading cable supplier of PetroChina can pay taxes to 0.12 billion yuan on its revenue of more than 1 billion a year, which is a myth compared with the average gross profit margin of 13.89 per cent in the recent year of listed companies in the wire and cable industry.
Now, the era of Liao Yongyong has come to an end forever, but the "willfulness" under his tenure has not yet begun. Let's pay attention to more "willfulness" stories.
[Source] China Quality News Network